|
|
|
 |
Were aluminum
liner bands ever used in the M1942 helmet? |
|
|
Yes, but not very
often. The M1942
combat helmet typically utilized the "second pattern" liner band
introduced in 1940. Theoretically, it is possible that some
M1942 helmets utilized the earlier pattern helmet liner. This
hypothesis is based on the fact that at least one producer of aluminum
liner bands (the original patent holder) manufactured this type until
1943. Only a handful of original, untouched examples of M1942
helmets with early model "first pattern" aluminum liner bands have
surfaced. All have been dated 1942 or 1943 and are factory
produced helmets, not field reworks or surplus refinished helmets. |
|
 |
Why were
reinforced side plates added to the aluminum liner band? |
|
|
The reinforced
plates added to both the left and the right sides of the "first pattern"
aluminum liner band (technically known as the M1931) were done to
prevent the liner band from bending and ultimately splitting in two.
From practical use, it was determined that the aluminum was too thin to
prevent stress cracks around the "D" ring mounts for the chinstrap.
As a result, the patent was amended to accommodate this modification. |
|
 |
I have an
original helmet with a rotted liner. Should I replace my old
decayed liner with a new one? |
|
|
It is generally
considered an unacceptable practice among collectors to replace an old,
worn out original liner with a replacement liner. Even so, this is
commonly done especially when original liners are still available.
The key emphasis should be placed on ensuring that an original artifact
remains in true form and condition. Modifying, altering, or
replacing major components such as rivets or liners devalues the
helmet's historical and monetary value. Imagine finding a rare
antique table and deciding to chop off one of its legs to replace it
with a new one and you can get the general idea. |
|
 |
Do all original
leather liners have only eight fingers? |
|
|
No. Most 60cm
and 61cm liners have nine fingers. The reason being that they
require more leather than a smaller sized liner. In some cases,
size 58cm and 59cm liners can also possess nine finger leather liners.
In these situations, the two rear fingers are sewn very close together
or the ninth is virtually cut in half. Leather used in the
assembly process was cut and fit to each of the liner bands. In
some cases, leather intended for larger liner bands was cut down to fit
smaller liner bands. |
|
 |
How many split
pins should be on a liner band? |
|
|
Factory produced
leather liner bands and rings required 12 or 13 zinc or aluminum split
pins. Earlier helmets utilized aluminum split pins while those
introduced in 1940 began using split pins made of zinc. It is not
uncommon to find mid- to late-war liners still using aluminum split
pins. |
|
 |
I have an zinc
liner band with square, early patterned "D" rings. How can this be
possible? |
|
|
In 1940 factories
began producing the zinc pattern metal rings used for helmet liner
assembly. Parts left over from aluminum liner band production were
often inserted and used on zinc pattern liner bands. As a result,
it is not uncommon to see a zinc pattern liner band with "D" ring mounts
intended for aluminum bands, or visa versa. Likewise, aluminum
liner bands produced in 1940 commonly used the newer, round pattern "D"
rings most often associated with the zinc pattern liner band ring.
When liner bands are encountered with these odd variations it is
generally a good sign that the liner band is original and dating from
the 1940 to 1941 time frame. Common sense holds that factories
used whatever parts were available until they were used up entirely.
Older parts were mixed with newer parts until depleted. |
|
 |
I have a liner
band ring that has no size or date marks in the metal. How can
this be possible? |
|
|
Some early as well
as late pattern liner band rings received no maker's marks. In
addition, some marks were pressed into the metal with little force
making them quite shallow and virtually impossible to read. |
|
 |
I have a liner
that has double inked size stamps on two leather fingers. How can
this be possible? |
|
|
It is not uncommon
to find late pattern zinc liner bands with leather fingers that have
been marked twice. |
|
 |
I have a liner
that has no markings on the leather. How can this be possible? |
|
|
Leather components
were assembled by hand and added to the metal liner band rings. In
some cases, the factory worker simply forgot to ink one of the leather
fingers with a size stamp. |
|
 |
I have a leather
liner that looks to have had a large section replaced. How can
this be possible? |
|
|
Scraps from the full
assembly process were made larger by the addition of another finger or
two in order to make them usable. This type of combination looks
odd but is in fact 100% authentic to the time period. Liners with
these characteristics are not "field repaired" modifications or postwar
reproductions. Rather, they are originals that were factory
produced by the splicing of two parts of leather combined to make a new
liner. |